Jeff Niemann – 2010


2009 was a big year for the big Texan. He came into camp in 2009 without a sure spot, made the team mainly because he was out of minor league options, and finished 2009 as one of the more reliable starters on the club. Niemann’s climb to the majors was as slow as his delivery to the plate as it was often derailed by some kind of ailment not foreign to front-line pitchers that come from a premier baseball school that annually competes deep into the NCAA College World Series as Rice does.  Collegiate pitchers can accumulate high workloads and schools that compete at a high level such as Rice does can see pitchers have workloads higher than those pitchers in the minor leagues. For example, Niemann threw more innings in his second year at Rice than he had any level in the Rays organization until this past season and there is a lot of debate in the baseball world about the affects of heavy workloads on young arms that has raged on for nearly 20 years.

To best review Niemann, his season should be broken down into three phases: The first two months, the middle three, and the final month as it truly was a tale of three seasons for Niemann all wrapped into one.

Part I: April and May

Niemann went 4-4 in the first two months of the season with a 4.44 ERA, which were very respectable surface stats for those who follow those. Yet, the hold thing was a house of cards. Niemann’s FIP was 5.22 as opponents were hitting .282 against him, his strikeout to walk ratio was a very poor 1.3, his strikeout rate was a low 5.3, and he was permitting 1.4 homers per nine innings thanks to a 45% flyball rate. The only reason his ERA was not worse was because he was stranding 75% of his baserunners.

Part II: June -August

Niemann gave up his 11th home run of the season in a solid no-decision against the Marlins on May 23rd. Little did Rays fans know that would be the last home run Niemann gave up in May, June, and nearly all of July as he went nine starts without surrendering a longball. Niemann began using his curveball more and his control improved from the first two months.  From June to August, Niemann threw 96 innings with a 3.47 ERA, a 5.8 strikeout rate, a 2.6 K/BB ratio, a 0.6 HR/9 rate, and permitted just 1.16 baserunners per nine innings.  He improved his walk rate from 4.1 in the first two months to 2.3 over the next three months and reduced his flyball rate by seven percentage points and both of those improvements definitely fueled his success in this period. From June 1st until that start on July 23rd, Niemann was 4-0 with a 2.85 ERA.

Part III: September

Niemann came into September having pitched 147 innings through the first five months of the season – 14 more innings than he had pitched in any level of his professional career.  26 year old pitchers typically have built up more stamina by this point in their career but Niemann has had some injury issues he has fought since his days at Rice that have not allowed him to get more work. I fully expected Niemann to tire in September as he hit that threshold but he did well considering the bad luck he had. He had a 4.66 ERA in September, but his FIP was only 3.64. Niemann was done in by a .380 batting average on balls in play that was fueled by a 26% line drive rate on the month. Despite those issues, Niemann had his best month of the season striking out 28 batters in 29 innings and he had a 2. 5 strikeout to walk ratio.

Niemann clearly showed strong growth across the season but hit a wall physically in September as he and the team tired out going down the stretch which included that ugly losing streak that I would rather not re-visit. If you look at Niemann’s splits pre and post-all star break, his growth is quite noticeable.


In the first half, his production out-paced his stats but in the second half he was a very tough luck pitcher that made strong gains in his strikeouts, command of the strikezone, and kept the ball in the park. In fact, while James Shields and Matt Garza struggled in the second half, it was Niemann and David Price that were doing the best pitching on the staff. Not many noticed this after the Rays traded Scott Kazmir and essentially raised the white flag on the season whether fans want to admit it or not.  Regardless of your opinion of that deal, the positive that came out of the second half is the young pitchers on the Rays staff stepped up and showed excellent growth down the stretch while being out of the spotlight. The work that Niemann did in the second half is exactly the kind of growth you want to see from rookie pitchers in their first year as many of those guys tend to fade off a lot earlier than September as they adjust to the biggest workload of their professional career.

How does all of this second half success translate to 2010? The table below show what the prognosticators have to say about Niemann’s 2010 potenital:


The projections are a bit sporadic in a few categories. There is a large variance in his K/9 projections as well as his walk rate and for some reason, fans at are projecting Niemann will be hit around pretty hard in 2010. This is not surprising given Niemann’s relative inexperience which has led to a rather uncertain baseline for people to project off of. Rays fans should hope that Niemann continues to improve from his growth in the second half of the season and moves forward rather than reverts back to the inconsistent and charitable flyball pitcher he was to start the 2009 season.

Previous 2010 previews:

Carlos Pena (12/29)

Ben Zobrist (12/20)

B.J. Upton (12/3)

James Shields (11/29)


About Jason Collette

This entry was posted in players and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Jeff Niemann – 2010

  1. Ray says:

    Got him for $3 in 12 team mixed auction today to round out my staff. Feeling pretty good about that.

  2. Pingback: [THE HANGOVER] The One Where We Discuss Shoppach’s New Deal, Arb Deadlines And Maddon On The Hotseat | Rays Index

  3. $3 for Niemann in a mixed league is a solid value. Niemann’s 2nd half gains are still flying under the radar.

  4. WFO says:

    You spent a lot of words dissing the presumed abuse of pitchers at
    Rice and other successful programs. Jeff was fine when he left Rice, or the Rays wouldn’t have made him a first round pick, would they? Are you suggesting that pro teams select pitchers without regard to their overall physical condition? You’re way off-base.

  5. That is not my point. Pitchers from successful college programs are going to get more work than those at other schools because they will play more games. There is a fair amount of supporting research out there that says high workloads from 19-22 put pitchers at an increased risk for injury. Niemann, Humber, and Towsend all went early in the 2004 draft and all 3 have had arm trouble with Niemann being the least serious.

    Before the Rays took Price in 2007, there were a lot of concerns about his workload at Vandy to the point many Rays fans wanted Weiters over Price. I talked with an injury expert about Price prior to the draft who said he had enough worry about Price’s work in college to go with Wieters first. Pro teams, if they know about the injury, will drop 1st round talent out of the first round – RA Dickey and his missing elbow ligament is a good example of that. Nobody can predict injury but guys like Paul Wilson, Kris Benson, Mark Prior, Ben McDonald, and Darren Dreifort with their college workloads and professional injuries plant that seed out doubt and the Rice trio of pitchers taken in 2004 within the first 8 picks now has only Niemann to look at with any form of major league success.

  6. Pingback: David Price – 2010 |

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s