Changing The Game

I have a long drive to work each morning and most mornings, I tune into XM 175 to hear baseball. Jim Memelo and Rob Dibble are the hosts and while I appreciate Jim’s angle, Rob’s drives me nuts most of the time. However, this morning, I found myself at odds with both of them and their stance on instant replay.

They both felt this morning that if baseball were to add expanded use of instant replay for the 2010 post-season, it would be a reactionary move to what Derek Jeter did on Wednesday night. For them, the worst thing baseball could do would be to change the integrity of the game to protect the integrity of the game in the middle of the season. My counterpoint to that is baseball is already doing this each and every baseball season starting on September 1st.

Baseball allows teams to expand the active roster to 40 players on September 1st which gives managers up to 15 new toys to play with in games down the stretch. Teams out of contention will sit proven veterans for rookies to give them a chance to show what they have and potentially weakening the quality of opponent a playoff contender faces. Teams in contention suddenly make a lot more moves in a game they otherwise would not make. Two times last week, Joe Maddon made six or more personnel changes in the late innings of a game – a total I don’t believe he has approached any other time this season.

All of the extra personnel changes affect the integrity of the game because managers are able to employ even more strategy with the extra personnel on the team. They are not afraid to pinch-hit for their second catcher knowing they have a third one on the bench. They can go all Tony LaRussa and cycle pitchers in and out of late innings to play the situation and they can give up the Designated Hitter as Maddon has done three times this month knowing they can pinch-hit for that spot later with the extra players on the roster.

Adding 15 new names to the rosters each September drastically alters the integrity of the game from a managerial and a quality of play standpoint. Adding expanded use of instant replay, right now, does neither. It would have taken an instant replay official 30 seconds to overrule the call made by Lance Barksdale the other night. Instead, we were treated to a five minute act of Jeter acting hurt and Maddon telling the officiating crew just how badly they screwed the pooch with their call.

It is bad enough baseball too often falls back on tradition as an excuse to ignore ways to improve the quality of the game but the excuse that adding replay in season is bad because it changes the integrity of the rules is laughable. It is fair because it applies to all 30 teams and it would in no way change how a pitcher pitches, how a hitter swings, or how a fielder fields a ball. It would hold those in charge of officiating the game more accountable and if they are too afraid of that, they need to pursue another career because we fans have had to tolerate this nonsense long enough.


About Jason Collette

This entry was posted in opinion and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Changing The Game

  1. Bob Kohm says:

    Perception is reality and although I agree with all of your points, I still think you’re wrong. Just as in a fantasy league, you make your rule changes before the season starts otherwise you implement them after the current campaign. To make rule changes now, especially expanded instant replay, would look reactionary and undercut the umpires while making Park Avenue look even more foolish than it normally does. The idea has merit, but not the timing.

    And don;t ever make me agree with that idiot Dibble in public again 😉

  2. Bob, I see your point if the rule in any way benefited one team over another or altered how the game was being played on the field. All I want is a 2 flag challenge system. That play could have been overturned in half the time it took Jeter to audition for his next movie role and for Maddon to be tossed out.

    The post-season is a whole new season where stakes are even higher. As we saw just last season when your Yankees benefited from a horrifically blown call, a series can turn in an instant due to an easily correctable error. The human element is the baseball player; the umpires have proven time and time again this season they are no longer beyond approach in regards to their ability to call a game.

    If they want autonomy, they can keep the strike zone and be graded by pitch f/x data and the like after the season by their supervisors. The sad part is, I still see strike zones that suck just as often as I did before pitch f/x became prevalent. Tom Hallion is still all over the place, Laz Diaz is still murder on LHB, and C.B. Bucknor is just outright guessing at pitches these days. Eric Gregg would be proud.

  3. Bob Kohm says:

    The post season isn’t a whole new season,t hough– it is the concluding tournament of the regular season. I just don;t see how making a major rule change is kosher.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s