To Review or Not to Review, That is the Question

Ok so those that watched the game saw a play early in the game that may have been a good idea to challenge.

Of course, I’m talking about Colby Rasmus’s lead-off walk in the third. It sure looked like David Price picked him off, but the play was close so even with replay we’re probably talking like a 50-50 that it could go either way. What do the numbers show? Well a runner on first and no outs leads to around .95 runs on average while if the out is called then you’re staring at nobody on and one out, a situation that averages around .30 runs.

Right off the bat you see that you’re talking about this play being worth around .65 runs, but we also need to factor in leverage since it was already 3-0 and it was early. The leverage of the situation was .81 so we can multiply that by the run expectancy to adjust for the situation. This yields .53 context runs for the situation. If Maddon thinks that another play will be close, reviewable and worth more than .53 context runs between the third and the end of the sixth then absolutely sit on the challenge, but I don’t think anything else would be worth much more than that while still being reviewable.

So here’s the problem, manager’s don’t see that baserunner as a big deal, but you’re talking something like half a run which is a huuuge deal in a single game. Plays like that might seem small in the big picture, but these are exactly what you should be challenging because with the unlikelihood of a more important play being missed later there’s no reason to keep the review in your pocket.

Instead we are treated to a dog and pony show on the field where are young heart throb Sam and Diane’s the umpire until he gets a thumb’s up which breaks up the game, slows it down, and ultimately will rarely lead to a review. Instead of dicking around out there once you break the chalk that should signify that you’re requesting a review. If you think it’s close then review it. If you’re right you get another and if you’re not it’s not like you’re the District Attorney aiming for a 100% conviction rate. Throw it out there and see what happens, but holding on to it for a rainy day is going to leave a lot of runs on the field.


About Jason Hanselman

Rays fan.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to To Review or Not to Review, That is the Question

  1. Tyler Barrus says:

    Do you think this is something that will take time for managers to get a handle on or is it something we will just have to live with as fans?

    • Jason Hanselman says:

      I think managers will continue this mummer’s farce until the league puts some sort of limiter out there. There are so few missed calls that you should be reviewing anything that you think is close the first chance you get. If you’re right you get another one anyway.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s